I paid RM60 (RM63 if I count the tax) just to sit in an uncomfortable chair for 3 hours, watching a bunch of people screaming meaningless words, failing at their attempt to be poetic, singing terrible songs and dancing unrhythmically. Then, I get to see how in the old days Malay couple used to date in the woods and have sex there.
That’s what I can sum up about Uda & Dara The Musical 2010 (UDTM) I watched last night. That story was supposed to be a tragic tale of love and tragic conflict between the rich and the poor. Unfortunately I did not get any of those from the play. I didn’t see anything that showed how strong the love is between Uda and Dara. I did not see enough hatred and tension between the rich and poor. I just can’t feel it. All I saw were horny young couple getting it on in the woods and an angry young man starting a riot because he got turned down by his girlfriend’s parents. It was a poor interpretation of the Uda & Dara tale, and an even poorer presentation of the story.
Gadis Di Kuburan
Nisan condong tegak bertaburan
gadis menangis kehibaan
tidak ada padang perjuangan
pahlawan gugur bergelimpangan.
Lari gadis menyembah ke tanah
diiringi sedu menggoncang bahu
tenang pahlawan dipeluk bumi
senyum terakhir tenang tersembunyi.
Kenangan lama bermain di hati
pelukan dan kucupan kasih
tidak ada garisan sepi
kata dipadu, janji dikunci.
“Sungguhkah, dinda?” tanya pemuda.
“Benar kanda,” sahutnya manja.
Ke jinjang pelamin setahun lagi
hilir berbiduk ke laut hidup.
Datanglah lamaran ke ayah bonda
penuh khidmat berjunjung duli
tetapi pemuda emas sesaga
tertolaklah lamaran, terurailah janji.
Matahari bersembunyi di balik awan
pulanglah orang membawa usungan
air di kendi kekeringan
terkejut gadis dari menungan.
Melangkah gadis menahan denyutan
pandangan terakhir terlempar ke nisan
setangkai kemboja gugur perlahan
merangkak senja menutup pandangan.
The poem above, Gadis Di Kuburan, was the ‘birth’ of this tale. Usman Awang published that poem in 1953, and in 1956 it was turned into a short story titled Uda & Dara. Since then, countless adaptations of this tale have been done into dramas, plays, etc.
Those earlier adaptations must have been really good for the story to stay famous and relevant till this day. I cannot say the same about this latest adaptation though.
The biggest pull for me to watch this play was Rahim Razali. He is the director, and this is not the first time he directs Uda & Dara. So what could go wrong, right? It’s Rahim Razali, a big name in local theater circuit, directing a play he directed before. Risk free.
Boy, how wrong was I!
I don’t know if there is anything worse than corny lines and corny scenes between two lovers. Basically that’s all the play was about, corny embarrassing scenes and lines. The opening scene that normally sets the tone of any play was bad, but because it’s Rahim Razali’s I quietly told myself to bare with it, it will get better as it go on. Turned out I was extremely deluded, and the only time I clapped during the play was at the end of the opening scene. After that my hands were too busy covering my face in embarrassment.
The romantic scenes made me cringe. The supposedly poetic lines and dialogues left me scratching my head. The action and movement of the actors were way over the top even for a theater, and often not in sync with the dialogues; random meaningless movements. The singing was below average (except for Misha Omar, as expected). The dance choreography was average at best and the dancers looked like they didn’t have enough practice.
The prop change between the scenes was a mess as well. I can’t pinpoint what was wrong with it exactly (I’m no expert of course), but I have never noticed the prop change in a play as much as I noticed it last night. They were slow and it was too obvious; it was painful waiting for them to be done with the prop change at the end of every scene. Unprofessional and disorganized if you like.
The glitch of the background during the opening scene of the show was unforgivable. Mistakes happen, that’s normal. However, the time they took to fix it was unacceptable. I actually felt like climbing up to the control panel (which was just behind me) to help them out with it, that’s how slow it was for them to react. Again, very unprofessional.
Now, the storyline. Like I said earlier, I don’t get it. I simply don’t.
Uda loves Dara, Dara loves Uda. Uda is a man’s man, Dara is the talk of the village. Uda is poor, Dara is spanking rich. So far so good, simple and straightforward.
Let’s continue.
Uda and Dara often date in the woods somewhere. Their date routine seemed to always be the same. Dara will be at the place first. Uda will always be late. Then Dara will get fed up having to wait for Uda everytime. Only then will Uda make his grand entrance. Hiding behind the trees, he will start singing. Dara will be surprised to hear Uda’s voice and starts looking frantically for Uda. She always fails. Uda then will show himself to Dara, emerging from behind the trees. Dara will smile and then they will hold hands.
Ok. Annoying, but ok nonetheless.
They talk about their love. “Abang sayang Dara.” “Dara sayang abang.” That kind of stuff. They talk about getting married. Their plans for the future. And that’s it. That’s all they have to show for their supposedly unbreakable love. No other problems or happenings to lead to the biggest obstacle of their love, the conflict between the rich and poor. It was just not enough to convince me of their love. Their love is the core of this tale, I think they should have put more emphasis on this.
On to the next big issue of the tale, rich vs poor. Nobles vs peasants.
They did try to show how arrogant and cruel the rich and the nobles can be, and just how humble and dignified the poor are. However, again, it was just not enough. Maybe it was the dialogue? The acting? The directing? All of that? I really don’t know. Whatever they were, in the end, Uda and his friends who were supposed to be the good guys came out looking like bitter thugs themselves. They didn’t get what they wanted so the only answer was to “PERANG!” Whyyyyy? Because Uda’s proposal was turned down by Dara’s mum? Way to go the good guys!
I don’t get it!
On to the sex scene. Yup you read that right, sex scene. Never in my wildest dream I would hope to see live sex scene in our country. Sigh.
Ok I’m being unfair there. That scene was supposed to be a beautiful symbolic show of true love between Uda & Dara. (I’m not going into right or wrong argument so save it). That scene was supposed to make you (girls) go “awww”. But like everything else in the play, it was very poorly executed. They had this group of dancers with ‘selendang’ dancing a ballet like dance, the lights were change to beautiful romantic mode, and the music was soft… Still, it went bad. The couple looked like a couple practicing Kamasutra moves. Embarrassing!
I could probably go on and on with this. I could probably think of another 100 reasons why I think the play was terrible. I’m not going to do that though. It’s enough to say that Uda & Dara The Musical 2010 (UDTM) is unfortunate enough to be THE ONLY bad play I have ever seen in my life. Admittedly, I don’t go to that many plays but amongst the plays I’ve seen is Impak Maksima, and I thought it was ok. This goes to show that I don’t have a high standard and I’m not hard to please at all, but still UDTM failed, big time.
I’m so disappointed with Rahim Razali and I hope he can bounce back from this.
Or maybe I’m just not cultured enough to appreciate UDTM. If that’s the case, I sincerely apologise.
Hi,umm....a very good review u wrote there...i actually wanted to watch this Uda&dara myself but i've decided to do some research first before i book my own ticket jz to make sure that it's gonna be worth it.. and i jz happened to come around to see how are the feedbacks abwt this musical...,,so yeah...umm..i can see that your very observant there....,,but there was one thing that surprised me.....was there really a sex scene in the musical? I mean,like those agressive kissing scenes and those kind of stuffs,seriously? Or.... ,sorry, were you jz exagarrating it? Well,Cz i jz thought that i would bring my whole family to watch it..but knowing that..i think i change my mind.....but anyway,i appreciate your review so much..thanks in advance.
ReplyDeleteHi there Mr Anonymous..I have watched this musical..so allow me to explain about the so called 'sex' scene...the acting of the 'sex' scene was not 'aggressive' anything, or else they wouldn't have allowed it to be staged at Istana 'Budaya'..it was subtle, the acting..but the message was clear-- when Uda said 'Biarlah bulan menjadi saksi, gunung menjadi wali pernikahan kita' (not the exact words)..and then after that there were dances and moves (them lying on the floor, side by side, etc) which may have resembled love-making--it was my interpretation that they were wed by the nature surrounding them and then the scene was followed by an act that strongly suggested love-making. If you are bringing kanak-kanak to see it then maybe they won't understand. Teenagers..beware.
ReplyDeleteThat was not the only bummer though. The script was not that impressive, the songs as well and the dancing was not in sync.
I yawned throughout the play, looking at my watch too many times and wanted to just storm out the theatre.
But then again dear sir, it might be just me. Maybe my interpretation is wrong. Maybe other people do not see what I see. After all, art is subjective, isn't it? :)
Eva is right, it wasn't anything aggressive. no kissing, definitely no groping. like i said it was supposed to be a beautiful scene but somehow they screwed it up. or maybe i totally lost interest by then so it looked worse than it was.
ReplyDeletei'd still go watch it if i were u though. live shows are always good. plus the tix price quite reasonable.
if u do go, can u lemme know what u think of it? wud appreciate that very much. thanks.